Quick Thought on Non-locality

While encountering the concept of non-locality, there is one thing that we are probably skimming over... that non-locality need not necessarily be localized only in the reciprocal aspect, but merely in a higher dimension.

For example, let us take a line... 1 Dimension. In Line-land, the distance between two points is all that can be measured, and let us say it is some value x. Now, if I take the same line, but loop it and form a circle, in 2 Dimensions, then I can make a circle with circumference = x, such that the starting and ending point of the previous line segment coincide. With respect to the 1D situation however, NOTHING has changed, the two are still separated by x. What is non-local in 1D is localized in 2D.

Neutrinos Moving Faster Than Light

Hi Bruce, You must have seen the latest news about the neutrinoes and faster than C. What's you take on this? Are they not taking into account the amount of coordinate time involved in the 730km, or could it be the absolute velocity of the earth that is not considered? I don't know myself, just thought I would get your opinion. Cheers, Robin.

I have not found much information as to their experimental setup, nor how they were able to pace neutrinos against photons to get the speed difference, but based on past experience with assumptions in physics experiments, I can make an educated guess as to what is going on.

First, consider that they are measuring "velocity", not scalar speed. And they are unaware of both the progression of the natural reference system and temporal motion, which is what particles and atoms are made of.

The Death of Death

I've been watching the BBC series, Torchwood, for the last few weeks and they have been addressing an interesting thought... this season is called "Miracle Day," and the miracle was that people just stopped dying. In other words, the life units refused to dissociate and revert back to inanimate status. Cells would just stay alive, even without food or the normal body chemistry. And it didn't matter if you were shot, stabbed or blown apart. The pieces would still remain alive, even if not connected together in a body. Which made for some problems, since consciousness stayed attached to the life units as well. People that should have died stayed alive and could feel pain. The series addresses some of the complications arising from the death of death, namely the world population started to dramatically increase, disease started to run rampant, and the need for "health care" for all those that should have died started overflowing the hospitals and there wasn't enough pain killer to go around.

Unit Acceleration and Dimensionality

I was thinking about how "unit acceleration" (for lack of a better term) would interact with the progression to produce non-uniform motion, per Gopi's discussion on Photons and Electrons.

Lineland Cosmogony: In the beginning...

Depending on theology, the initial state of the universe is either "void" or "one-ness", unity. From the void state, a single being usually emerges (such as Ymir in the Norse), again bringing the initial state to a unity. So, in the beginning, there was One-ness:

\Large \begin{vmatrix} \; 1 \; \end{vmatrix}

Which is a uniform motion prior to the dichotomy of space and time--a progression--but as yet, no direction. Most western theology has an opposition to this progression ("free will"), which Larson calls it a "direction reversal" where the initial condition is "outward" and the opposition is "inward." Eastern theologies, however, start with the concept of akasha, the aether, which is opposed by aksara brahma, which means "non-involuting"--in other words, the initial condition is "inward" and the opposition is "outward".

'Sound' Thinking

Had been thinking about the nature of sound. It ties up very closely with the matter-view of the world, or the motion view of the world.

Consider a sound, being propagated through space... it is in essence a pressure wave, a series of compressions and rarefactions. It can manifest as a longitudinal wave in fluids, while in solids it can also be transverse.

Photon and Electron

I have gone through the logical structure that defines the photon a number of times now... and here are my tentative comments.

Atomic Co-magnetism

I was trying to simulate the magnetic lines when co-magnetism is present in an atomic structure, from a "second" magnetic unit. Thought it would be easy, since co-magnetism is just the inverse of magnetism. So, using the rules from Nehru's Figure 1b (co-magnetic lines) and 1d in his article, Glimpses Into the Structure of the Sun: Part 1, the Nature of Stellar Matter. Got this result...

Magnetic / Co-magnetic field of the atom

Searl Effect Generator (SEG) Magnetic structure

Using the information on John Searl's website, I have been able to determine the magnetic configuration of his SEG motor (rotor and stator), from known structures in the Reciprocal System. (I know what he is doing, but I don't know HOW he is doing it, and that's the bit he is keeping secret--the way he "charges" the SEG parts.)

How to explain Searl Effect generator using RS2?

I think this would be a simple question for RS theroy. I search the forum and found bperet said,"The Searl effect is based on anti-gravity response, not really "free energy". Is that means that this machine is just a permanent-magnet machine? HOW "The Searl effect is based on anti-gravity response" ?

Pages

Subscribe to Front page feed